CLICK HERE TO READ THIS FULL REPORT: "While installing firewalls and antivirus software on your computer may keep it safe from conventional threats such as worms and viruses, these security tools do not inspect data downloaded through browsers - a loophole that attackers can exploit. 'The firewall is dead,' says Google security specialist Niels Provos.
...The sleazy side of the web has long been a place where people have been easily duped into downloading malicious programs for themselves. Lured to a site by spam and then promised pirated software or pornography, for example, visitors click on a link only to download a bot.
Now, though, even an ordinary website can be risky. At a meeting on botnets held last month in Cambridge, Massachusetts, Provos warned that many web users are becoming the victims of "drive-by" downloads of bots from innocent websites corrupted to exploit browser vulnerabilities. As firewalls allow free passage to code or programs downloaded through the browser, the bot is able to install itself on the PC. Anti-virus software kicks in at this point, but some bots avoid detection by immediately disabling it."
AND HERE TO READ A SECOND DESCRIPTION OF HOW THIS HAPPENS: Russians selling ''spyware for lamers'' kits for $15
Posted on March 25, 2006
Branded as WebAttacker, the script-kiddies' dream kit provides an overview and index to all the freeware and shareware spyware creation packages available on the Internet. The kit includes spam-sending techniques to lure victims to compromised Web sites and a number of applets and scripts that simplify the task of infecting computers.
Researchers at SophosLabs discovered the spyware kit on a Russian Web site run by self-professed spyware and adware developers. The kit is available for sale directly from the site, which even offers technical support to buyers.
AND HERE FOR SOME RESULTS AND FURTHER STUDY: This brings to question how secure is Internet? How secure are dedicated networks like e.g. Army, Navy or Air Force’s networks?
From a National Security point of view they are 100% insecure.